Fear clashing with assumption A perfect storm Day 811

Fear clashing with assumption, a perfect storm.

What does the word assumption mean. If I immediately look at the word, I see the words a-ssump-tion. It has the sound “ a sum.” Thus, I liken this word to a sum of parts, or a sum of experiences or skills and/or beliefs. Fear on the other hand, is a lack of purity, or a state of insecurity, an inability to HOLD something and sort it out. It is like waking up in a foreign country where customs and language are very different from one’s own sum of experiences, or measure within, to find one’s self unable to communicate, to interact, to move as one’s habituated self, or unable to process what one is/was and interact with the new SUM of the world one suddenly finds one’s self within.  It is also similar to having to learn something under pressure where a fear of failure is ever present as a belief . Either scenario potentially leading to an unsettling or unnerving sensation that can also be likened to an imbalance much like vertigo. One can become lost in the storm of doing the sums of self and transferring that into the sums of the new environment or processing and integrating new forms. A feeling of vertigo can happen as one moves into deconstruction of a habit into the new. An entrenched self directive means can appear to be losing something as what one has defined one’s self as, into the new.  That space can appear to be a loss. The same can happen in learning a new piece of music. The smallest formations of notes appearing to be difficult to grasp. It is a loss of fluidity, telling of a degree of automation. 

When fear meets assumption, can the two effectively communicate? It would take time and patience for this to move into clarity. If one moves into resistance and reaction, it will take even longer. One can become pro=active in defending one’s self definition, habituated and entrenched.  If one moves from the problem into reaction and then attempts to address the reaction only instead of realizing the overall problem, a sorting out of the two is going to take even longer. One is in protection of a resonant template of experience and belief superseding the reality, the practical physical world surrounding one’s resonant self. A practice of resolving reactions as one’s self definition, without addressing the immediate root disquiet or imbalance, can also limit through and as a stagnant action, that habit automating, then change will demand a greater effort. 

The mirage of information is usually presented from one side, as our form of media, of sharing information comes from a panel on a screen, where we cannot answer, and where so-called authorities are placed in a central point, at a table, where they are asked questions, and as such, the frame of information is controlled to never leave a given narration. A catch 22, because those in a stage of discovery can cause conversations to ver off from the conversation but also ask important questions that can derail what is accepted as truth. Controls can help focus, yet controls can also reject relative and important information. It is another one of those instances where it can go both ways. One can focus on only one side, intensify and magnify one aspect to the point it becomes hypnotic, which is using one extreme to justify a mean. This is also a mis-use of the imagination, which is one’s mind template of experience or memorized templates about things in this reality without living practical application. 

Imagine being in a certain state and suddenly hearing a piece of music that takes one out of that state and places one into another. In some ways, when we have not mastered how all of this happens, we can become like a feather being tossed about by giant waves. We lose sight of the ground and spin around, having no awareness of where we are, and how to ground ourselves back into where we are. A great use of creating a veil to distract and use to be lost in self interest that is a state of denial and also to accumulate profit. And yet, that accumulation is really an illusion in itself, because ultimately it cannot work. The problems it creates ends up occupying the attention of the one creating the form, so both become that same feather being tossed in the waves. It becomes a reality divorced from reality, which is what has happened. Extinction rather than transformation is a testament to that. 

Outside of this, one must really know the code, as words, used by humans, to realize the code so well, one can see the manipulations, as a sum, and at the same time, what is here. In such a scenario, uncertainty would become of shorter duration in this reality, and a sense that one could sort things out would become bigger, as recognition of “ not having enough information” would be realized as a point of growth instead of something to cause embarrassment. Hence, transformation, or regrouping would be embraced as the joy of discovery. It is as though the music that exits as the dialogues of men at this point is so caught in a magnified state of uncertainty, as fear not realizing itself as that, and a set body of information believed to be more real than reality. Here limited made-to-be-real assumption ( because it is a series of and as a measure of what is “ right”) clashes and uses uncertainty and fear to justify itself as it magnifies a set body of information from a one sided platform. In this hypnotic state composed of limited information, one can no longer hear the grass growing, as the expression of this physical reality. Remember, it is, as the golden rule made public notice in every school, to take that which is good and does no harm, which is the same equation of and as to give as one would receive, which is the same equation as becoming a master of self as life. The simplicity of this, is astounding, the chaos is a resonant belief system, which is a mis-use of the imagination, as an over use of the imagination, to the degree one loses one’s ability to be grounded in the physical, respecting all things, reflected in our bodies losing touch with this reality as we age. It has been made public notice to also bring heaven down to earth, no matter what surrounds that statement. 

This is why the golden rule is of great import. It is the rule to do no harm, and to take what is good. It is the rule to give as one would receive. It is the rule to investigate, to take the time to slow down and hear the muse/formation presented, to then assess that creation with regard to this ground called earth, and only move within that that is more of transformation than eliminating what does not fit into an idea within one’s self only. It is to say, if we all slowed down, we might find an unfolding that dis-covers our own centuries long movement in an alternate reality that is destructive of earth to the extent it is so slow moving we have not seen the destruction of this earth because each generation is so caught in this perfect storm it cannot realize what the earth looked like in previous generations. It is like one big orchestral piece, which is a series of measures moving in tandem with one another, and yet having forgotten one another or are in a state of assumption that this is the way it is, when it is not. The means is the same, but one is in separation from the whole. And the means cannot remember itself and how it was constructed, thus when it meets something outside of itself, it assumes immediate recognition because what one focuses on, attends to occupies all one’s presence, and ignores states of “ less information or more information” causing conflict or friction which is fear more than resolution. I mean, if we realized fear as confusion, then we are starting to realize the solution, because it only means that more information is needed to lend greater direction. A state of “ greater direction” need only remember how the sum of parts was formed that generated a state of assumption. The degree of separation of self expression probably has a correlation to how intense is one’s fear and or expression of assumptions- which must be brought out because that is how one has learned to express. The thing most resisted is the means through friction and conflict. And yet, a truth exits, it is as tough we are also at the same time, attempting to effectively voice our truth. Difficult in a resonant storm of beliefs, opinions and ideas. 

If one were caught in all of this, would the idea of discipline be considered difficult? Would learning something new appear to be impossible? The degree to which one cannot slow down and learn something new, is indicative of how much one is caught in a set resonant body of beliefs. In this context, saying something is outside of one’s comfort zone is an acknowledgement of an inability to change.  The fall back ideology of “ being in a comfort zone,” is simply a cry of lack that screams for a means to realize its own veiling mechanisms. 

Someone I knew said that they could not meditate, they could not get themselves to be quiet within. What does this suggest? Does it suggest that a resonant construct of stories of information had taken hold of the person, was accepted and allowed a BUILT by the individual? That a person can HOLD something, over many years, to the degree it blocks taking in new information, such as being a form of quiet within themselves, is telling in itself. And yet, that quality of long standing holding, indicates that we can hold “ things,”  that we are in deed the masters of in inner template of a resonant construct. Why not practice holding a presence within this reality, focusing on how this reality works, as a relationship to always relate to what is here as earth? 

It is known that disciplines can take 10,000 hours to master, which could be in 5 to 7 years. One could say the equation as a system of 4 years of college, is the living math of and as a potent period of intense focus allowing that 10,000 hours. Yet when done through memory, an outcome of tenuous hold os something easily forgotten because it had no real living practice, no real association to a more long-term development as direct interaction with what is real. 

Depending on one’s starting point, if one has a greater discipline in one area, one can more readily move through another discipline. This takes changing one’s focus, which means one must develop an awareness of one’s focus. This is the what, where, when, why and how scenario which is a good template to use to ground one’s self through questions and answers in a given moment. Anything that would build a greater presence of self and self as existing because and as a physical being on a physical earth, would unfold a more expansive awareness that had a greater recognition of uncertainty, and the means of closing the gap of uncertainty, into realizing the means to the end as gathering an awareness of information. This would be information that allows one to hold something that can withstand change, or meet change with joy. In one way, one need not “ hold” anything because one is more in synch with what is the body of one, as the physical. Is this not what it means to move synergistically, or symBIOtically? The living earth is our bio. 

Sometimes, I have noticed what I would call a soft approach to discipline. Again, as all things are of a balance, a soft approach to discipline makes excuses, as the truth in a “ soft approach” does not realize the soft approach is more in the application as small action. Meaning one focuses without back chat in the mind, or one practices with full attention onto the smallest and most simple of movements, as the small we understood allows the construction of more complex parts with greater ease. The soft approach tends to not want to point out that a mastery of the focus on the small has not been done, and the lack thereof does not want to hear that it has not focused on the small. Classic story of what many master’s say, when they ask initiates to repeat a small seemingly monotonous task. The initiate cannot understand the reasoning behind this, and believes they should have recognition for their somewhat developed capacity. The master sees the flaws in the starting point that are inhibiting greater ability to work effectively with more complex sums, the initiate has assumptions that have forgotten of such. In such a situation, the master must stick to their steps which is not considered being soft, as they at the same time, are using the small to soften, or unleash, or unknot, an urgency of assumptions.  The innate self defining template, or construct of information can have a sense of losing something, which can generate fear - or that sense of vertigo as one’s focus point-, as that very deconstruction process, when not formally understood. Then a resistance happens, one that is either overcome or not as resistance comes at a point of change. 

A master of something, has the capacity to realize assumptions and work with them. From another dimension, in terms of power structures, I can understand why in some social revolutions, it was the educated in a society that were killed, because they more than likely were the ones close to this realization over all. Yet, those lead by assumption and desirous of power, understood that this point of change had to end, or their movement onto the next level of control would be eliminated. This becomes the feathers being tossed in the waves, unaware of the waves as the real medium of their existence!  This is why administrators are usually, as the word sounds, the biggest traitors. In all, life will. The real disease is a state of stagnation, and yet seeing through that state of stagnation, or rejection of opportunity, or the avoidance of answers in regards to questions asked,  is the means of perpetuating the building of castles, as power structures on that centralized hill, that is in itself an illusion because real life is symbiotic, meaning of parts working in tandem.

After all, our bodies are working organisms, where most of the bacteria in our bodies are separate entities, of which the absence of we cannot exist. It is as though the physical allows us to see what we have allowed within, as the test of manifesting what we create ourselves as. We have in deed,  become what we were warned against, which is to be living value judgements instead of real living. We humans have allowed a personality to become larger than life. Our personalities are basically assumptions, and we allow an administration of assumptions ignoring the consequences of our assumptions on the reality that enables us to see our assumptions. Astounding! 

We can have moments of a sense of knowing that is not of the language used in the every day. It is more a sense of presence seeing or sensing an order of this reality. Yet, one must define that living reality, of which the sum of parts, are the means to the end. One must become a master of one’s focus ability. Would it not make sense that we must know ourselves in detail before we can really know what is around us? And does not what is around show us to ourselves? 

I remember having moments where my perspective of reality changed, yet only for a fleeting moment. In that moment of perhaps being a gap, it was that sense of knowing on some levels, mixed with judgements about what that was that was coming up, at which point I jumped out of that sense, and even forgot it. With hindsight I asked the question as to whether such could be real, because I had no control over it. How could a “ sense of knowing,” a surprise at such a different perspective suddenly appearing, and at the same time, an awareness of and as suddenly asking a question as to why I did not have control over such a thing? It was a moment that lead to a question of and as “ what is going on!” Such a moment happened where I realized every word had to be rebuilt. 

There is this “ sense of knowing” that also means developing greater awareness of the parts, and that does not move as coded/scripted language as humans use, and the contrast of the change from  one perspective to another, of which I had no control. It would mean that I was running on assumptions, resonant within and projected without. One’s assumptions end up directing in automated ways, because they are a reflection of a lack of presence being used effectively - as to  be in the practice of considering all things, taking the good and ensuring no harm. The formula has been given, it is made public notice, because earth can be heaven on earth. The way and the means are really the acceptance of the gift of this. So many times we ask, but our own morality gets in the way of accepting the answer when it comes. The absence of accepting this life that is who one really is, is the absence of to “ know thyself.” I mean, evidently, on some Greek structures, “ know thyself”  was carved on the entry head stone which is public notice! Therefor, we can blame no one but ourselves.  

Assumptions can become one’s intuition, that when meeting “ incomplete information” as what happens when someone is in fear, as in lacking real presence - which is given and lost and forgotten - can cause the perfect storm. This storm can become all that one sees, which is what is meant to see through the veil. And it is what is meant when a Christ said to forgive them for they know not what they do. They are in a now of resonant assumptions that can easily move into fear, made evident in friction and conflict. This is a manifesto of living problem-reaction-solution instead of problem solution. Answering to reaction is a mis-use of control, answering to the problem is more of a correct use of control.  The other side, is that one can ONLY speak what one has allowed, thus one will speak what one has used to protect one’s inner resonant template of ideas, beliefs and opinions, because this is what one has focused on, what one has practiced. Vocal and focal are similar in sound. It is the gift that shows one’s self to one’s self. We are the words we effectively know. We are that of which we speak. When we lack a recognition of the grass growing, when we cannot HEAR/HERE the grass growing, we are in effect in separation from the golden rule, that which has been made public notice, thus we can blame no one but ourselves.