Day 592 Real Cyber Attacks are the Presentational Use of False Dilemmas

I realized in the years that I practiced an instrument that any and all emotional values I allowed during my focus within the act of practicing remained. I had to be clear, I had to have a focus that was what I would call total.

We as physical instruments are exactly the same, how we are within remains with us and must be cleared or it becomes a distraction from being present.

I also realize that as a child, being with parents that did not realize this and how emotional feeling bodies as polarized ideas about something, creating false dilemmas taking one quality or value about something and suggesting that one was good and another was bad, created a lag in perception because a threat of an either or scenario was created in separation from practical, physical reality. So, this judgement, because this is what this in essence is, remains as a self definition and it is like a cloudy focus that then is laid upon reality, causing a disconnect, which causes mis-steps, which causes an inequality to reality. 

Then one’s actions in reality lack clear direction and one ends up not seeing the height of that step up to that door, for example. One has become a bubble of separation, and that bubble is composed of energy, a lesser substance, that is yet heavier than the substance of the life around us.

As a child, was my common sense, a natural sense, not substantiated? Was it that because of the accumulation of separation and consequential energy personifications recited as the words only, that which was a value that supported a framework that was another layer of consequence because of that initial separation of value judgment no longer regarding the practical physical manifestation of life? Am I the product of the “ sins of the fathers” genetically and in accepting and allowing a dampening of an innate common sense because that common sense was not given opportunity to substantiate qualities for what they were without an added value of being made less through simple ignorance?
Would such end up as an idea that one was not good enough, when that “ good enough” was built of lack of substantiation only, which has nothing to do with “ good enough”?
And thus a false dilemma has been accepted and allowed. The problem is that  this emotional state creates a lag in acting responsibly to reality. It ends up being carried with one, and every time one “ plays” as self as life as an instrument of life, that “ film” remains as idea. Then, this projection, just like a TV, sources the very substance of the physical, and ends up diminishing the physical until one dies. It is a death of slow fading, and not a birth, a b-earthing of oneself equal and one to creation. It is not one sounding life, it is one sounding - so to speak- energy. It is why one’s legs become heavy, it is why one’s back becomes inflexible. These are all indications of the degree to which one has accepted emotional/feeling lags, as I call them in this moment, that are built of  calling one value a good and another a bad and comparing the two to suggest a “ what if” or “ supposed threat” , because in practical reality a cup is a cup and it exists here.

The physical world, and the qualities of this, as the words humans use to communicate , is the perfect check list to order ourselves here, practically, to earth ourselves as life.

I watched a speech by Obama on a major news channel yesterday. It was about a “ cyber attack” and whether people should go to the movies. I thought, how does going to the movies have anything to do with a cyber attack? Why are these two things impulsed in one moment? One is getting in a car and driving to a theater and the other is being online. This demands some real “ stretch of the imagination.”  What is the agenda here, on this that had no section I could readily see to make any kind of comment - another red flag in our modern age of communication? Within this scenario, this in itself is a one way fits all movement, take in the false dilemma and shut up. I thought we had bully laws in place. Or is this the law of the debtors on the ground, the law of the liability carriers as the collective that just take it all without question which means we cannot blame anyone but ourselves? 

So, now one can drive to the theater, with a threat of cyber attack as one drives, distracting oneself from answering that child’s question about why there is a dog out in the cold looking awfully skinny, to which an answer is provided that dismisses why that dog is there instead of investigating and substantiating to the child what the child senses is a reality that has some discrepancies that make no sense. And that child becomes less than that moment of common sense wanting license. And that common sense is what will lead to the full potential of that child if it is allowed substantiation. This is the real dilemma, do we choose to give that life as that child their full potential, or do we continue to allow a media that uses false dilemmas to distract our equality to a common sense of reality?

Can we not see how the valley of good and evil is all in our heads and the means now used by media via false dilemmas,  is what we are allowing within and has accumulated into a system that overall destroys the full potential of our children as a natural common sense is denied through ignorance, of which each of us was at one time? Is it not time to change our system to one that allows each the time and space to ensure that that potential as life in our children reaches its full capacity as this is what we would want for ourselves?

We must begin to realize the tactics of good and bad judgements and take the parts and align them into practical reality, to remove the emotional lags, and walk steadily back into our common sense. We can no longer be confused by the warping of reality, strings of gloom and doom,  fear tactics distorting reality. And we must realize that we have allowed a system that uses this, and that has a financial structure that leads our boys into combat, discarding them when no longer needed. But, we allowed ourselves to get caught in the dream of becoming something, as being a man, or woman, through armed force, a force that has no real alignment to our innate common sense, and a force that creates a arm of destruction towards others and eventually with self. This is not what we want for our children or ourselves, thus it is time to stop, to stand, and as all arms as life as our human physical bodies, must stand as one, to build a system that is equal to life, which is to give what one needs to live a life of dignity. In practice, in policy, this is a Living Income Guarantee.  Become responsible as life, substantiate yourself as life, arm yourself with the principle of what is best for all, because this is what is best for self. 

Day 197 Friction/conflict is only limited choice

I become angry within interacting with society, where what is most frustrating is not being able to talk, or believing myself to not be heard, which sometimes turns out to not be true as people have come and said what I have said makes sense. Sometimes i am impatient and want an immediate response. I am an American and am conditioned to want to be served NOW and to want convenience. I forget that a huge tree does not grow over night, or in an instant. So, when I become frustrated within a memory, as I feel I have lost because I did not get immediate results, I must stop and breath and investigate what it means to produce something with long lasting effects, with the strength to be consistent as a directive principle, where I do not allow myself to become emotional and, as this, judgmental, allowing myself to go into a polarity of a belief in choices, where I then believe I could have done something differently, which is self judgement and self blame. Within this, all there is to do is investigate what was done and to realize what is here as what has been accepted and allowed and that allowing myself to become overwhelmed with ideas and memories, as self judgements, is not a solution. Here, it is to become equal and one with the judgements and realize they are the separations and the fears, and as blame, within or without, this blame must become one and equal and walked back into equality and oneness as what is best for all, because it really is fear, as it is the belief of a choice to deny- also, the pushing of a limited selection of insight, thus the cause of a conflict and friction within and as myself. The moment I allow myself to become overwhelmed by this, I stop and I breath, and I realize all I can do is investigate within understanding what is here, and equalizing myself with what is here and becoming absolutely directive within what is best for all. This will take time. Terra-forming myself one and equal to this physical world, so that fear is no longer what directs, as the physical is understood and one and equal to myself here.
We see this same action happening within the world, where the precautionary principle is circumnagivated through not allowing studies that tell another side and the use of the words “no significant difference,” meaning that there is a difference, within industry and products. It is like what is said, in known ignorance, “I don’t know of this,” or “ We have no documentation of this”. The paper world is a place to hide, through placing limited information onto the paper and presenting only this. Because something is not on that piece of paper within that administration, then it does not exist, even in the face of physical evidence, which ends up being labeled as “anecdotal” which does not make any sense because research data is a collection of anecdotes! Anecdotes are physical evidence.
I forgive myself for allowing and accepting myself to allow myself to become overwhelmed with choice, where I go from one polarity to another believing that there is a choice, which is myself not wanting to walk through the superficial face values presented, where should I investigate such face values further I meet with having to stand up and point out what is not being looked at, which is only really a shock to that face value and nothing else.
I forgive myself for allowing and accepting myself to believe that I have a choice, where I reject what is here and create friction within and as myself in avoiding what is here instead of accepting and investigating what is here as one and equal to myself here.
I forgive myself for allowing and accepting myself to not realize that the simplicity of facing what is here needs only common sense of what is here and any reactions are simply a choice as not wanting to face what is actually physically here.
I forgive myself for allowing and accepting myself to not see, realize and understand that the facade of the bully is simply a fear that needs to be walked through, one and equal to myself here.
When and as I feel myself becoming overwhelmed I see, realize and understand that this is myself believing there is a choice, where any acceptance of this and response as this is myself not being honest with myself and instead looking for what will be the solution within relationships as to what is right and wrong in terms of survival within this present system as the being of having a choice means that I am in my mind and not here.

I commit myself to breathing, to slow myself down when I face friction and conflict within knowledge and information, where I, as what has been taught, see only the choices presented, instead of always checking/investigating and realizing that uncertainty is myself unaware of the whole, of what is best for all, and thus no decision can be made within the conflict as it is myself lost within a choice, as the only choice is what is best for all, and as I have no practice within and as this, I must stop and breath and bring myself back to what is physically here.
I commit myself to breathing, to realize that within breath, the uncertainty, as the conflict as the belief in choice, is what must be deconstructed and investigated, then corrected within the principle, as an absolute directive, of what is best for all.
I commit myself to realizing that I am life, and within this, the memories of the mind as the morality within relationships that serve the interest of survival within a system of inequality, present limited choices only within programmed personalities lacking a developed ( denied) common sense, and thus it is this limitation that is the prison and the cause of friction where the physical senses a lack of common sense as equality with this physical world.
I commit myself to no longer answer as the protection and defense of a personality as a program as what I have been taught, even when threatened with the personification of reaction as “ that is not polite” as what has been said to me within and without, to see, realize and understand that this is myself wanting the comfort of a energetic feeling, this feeling an answer as the mind, and not an answer in common sense of this physical world.
I commit myself to realize that the only peace/piece there is that is real, is oneness and equality with this physical world, where what is directly here as this physical world is what can be walked with and as, as this is what is real, here.

Desteni

Equal Money

Eqafe  

Free Eqafe Interviews

Journey To Life

Heaven's Journey To Life

Creation's Journey To Life

Earth's Journey To Life

Documentaries