I guess one could say we are like still water. Everything we " exist " as remains within us. Just like at times it takes time to understand something when using memory, when memorizing information.
Eventually, what is memorized comes reverberating back, or perhaps like a picture about something builds within us, a resonant form, a lesser form, an image about something. Hence, when we repeat a fear, that entity around that fear, as that focus, as that repetition, that also builds something just as memorizing information builds something. A pace at which one moves also " builds " something. If that pace is of memorized movement, that becomes one's timing.
This happens with groups too, as a musical group that practices something at a certain timing will get stuck in that " timing" and it takes a greater effort to change up that timing. And there is also bounce back at the beginning, meaning things appear to have gone into a different timing, but change the space and a bounce back will happen, as though there is an interruption in focus because of the change, and the previous " version" runs by default.
We know this is possible because we have terms such as " group think."
We know this is possible in reading research because it is know that if a child is not reading fluidly by the third or fourth grade it takes an extraordinary effort to change what has accumulated in the flesh, as it is the flesh at the end of the day that is accumulating that internal resonance. That resonance becomes one's lens. it determines focus. It is all about what we focus on. Therefore, there is no truth, there is only here.
This means that lies by omission are still lies and lies harm the flesh because they cloud the lens, especially in a world that is using memory to ostensibly " teach." That in itself is a lie. One can work very hard running around in circles in a " group think " wheel and go nowhere. For those who use a positive to justify something, such as a group or person working hard, is another automated response exposing that which becomes group think, and justification, and is a form of ignorance about how the flesh works.
Flesh and self are so so so similar. The " f" can stand for focus and the " lesh" has all the same letters as the word " self." How words are structured into the flesh will determine one's focus. Too much miss-use of internal image use and one spoils the focus. Our societal focus problems, the ones with an alphabet soup of names, are all a reflection of a loss of focus, a loss of a consideration of all things, a loss of the wisdom of the togetherness of all things. This was the message, an age old one, of and as " the sins of the fathers."
Hence, " thinking" becomes a thin-king. What would build motivation when being focused on a consideration of all things? When one is able to recognize what has been covering a " lens " would one move as a consideration of all things? That space before the " lens " is clouded with a thin-king to the extent one loses a sense of the internal " time " lens and the living space that is what we are in? Because children learn more quickly before that " lens " builds. Hence, an improper " lens " or directive of focus, causes a separation?
And the irony that in today's educational speech, this kind of learning is called " accelerated " learning - that of all senses being engaged. And if one is caught in the " group think," the clouded lens from a mis-use of accumulating internal information ( which is in itself the absence of focus here, or the absence of always in all ways considering all things ) what is the outcome? Some would call this " cognitive dissonance." This visible when one internal cloud thwarting focus meets another clouded lens thwarting focus. All a mirage, all a construct of information, rather than a constant respect for all things. The game of control is done through lack. It is a wraping of " thin-king" constructs. Within this, in our schools I have heard it mentioned that one NOT follow all thoughts that come up. Hence, we admit to the limitations of information even as experience from a lack, is within us.
I used Chat GPT to find information. I generated different constructs depending on what information I asked. Therefore, chat GPT can be incredibly limited. And even then, it appears there exists input that twists and warps information, that veil the " whole " story, or all of the information around an issue. Automation polarizes information leading to thin-kings in the flesh/self. Therefore it cannot work and never will work. I had an uncle who worked in radiology who was in his nineties, he would always say to me that it is known that AI will never work.
Therefore, overall, a system of lack exists, a system of survival because of a cloudy internal veil of " lies-by-omission." It is invisible if one is caught in group think. It is visible if one is losing spatial ability. Meaning, if one is older and losing memory, often visible by the repetition of stories of the past, often filled with a thin longing, a dreamy " longing" state of focus. It is visible in a loss of changeability. It is visible in the push-back as clinging to an internal belief form, leading to internal agitation that looks just like anger, or defensive and offensive behaviors.
Separation is visible. The more one is lost in an internal construct of information, the harder it is to realize the thin-king of separation. It is overall, a loss of focus.
When we are no longer able to drive, or learn something new, or become stagnant in physical movement, are we in the consequences of a natural state that is a state of presence? Thinking, is that presence? What is a " consideration of all things"?
Thomas Paine said in so many words that moderation in behavior is a virtue, moderation in principle is the opposite.
No comments:
Post a Comment